A number of community questions were submitted to Cardinia Shire Council at the July 21 meeting.
In regard to the changing of streetlighting in Beaconsfield, Tracey Van den Dolder asked why the globes “cannot be changed rather than the whole light fitting?”
In response, general manager infrastructure services James Kelly said, “AusNet have advised council the globes in the existing fittings cannot currently be retrofitted with an LED globe as the use of an LED retrofit globe is not yet approved by AusNet as the network owner.”
A further question by Tracey asked, “why council is still going ahead with the changing of light fittings in the Beaconsfield area when this review by Ausnet has not yet been completed?”
“Officers are implementing the decision made at the Council meeting on 17 March 2025 (Item 7.2.5),” Mr Kelly responded.
John White queried the Pakenham Golf Course in regards to its future and if council “will take into account the significant voluntary contributions made by the community at the inception of the club?”
“Council officers have completed a feasibility study regarding the future of golf at the Pakenham Golf Course. As part of the next steps, community consultation will be conducted in August. The feedback received during this process, along with expert reports and the historical context of the site, will inform a recommendation to councillors. This recommendation is expected to be presented by the October council meeting,” general manager, Debbie Tyson responded.
John also asked if council could clarify how contributions will be recognised or factored into the deliberations regarding the club’s future.
“This information will be incorporated into the forthcoming report to council for consideration,” Ms Tyson said.
Anthony Volpi submitted four questions with one regarding the net cost of providing and maintaining the Cardinia Cultural Centre.
“The total net cost to council for the Cardinia Cultural Centre, 2024-25 year is $1.264M. This is derived from total revenue of $490k being offset against total costs of $1.754M,” Ms Tyson responded.
Anthony asked if the same could be provided on the Pakenham Golf Course.
“The total net cost to council for the golf course 2024-25 year is $140k total expenditure, no income. It should be noted that these numbers are still subject to council finalising its end of year audit,” council responded.
“Can Council advise if they have approached the State Government (executive or legislative) seeking a change to the planning of the golf course,” Anthony submitted.
“Officers have not approached the State Government through this current process,” Ms Tyson said.
Anthony also submitted if council can advise what plans they have if the golf course is to be scrapped, as to providing sporting facilities for those above 50.
“No decisions have been made regarding the golf course. A report will be submitted to the August Ordinary Council meeting requesting Council to support community engagement,” Ms Tyson responded.
